IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/buseco/v42y2025i42p57-76.html

Reflections Of Financial Digitalization On Foreign Trade And The Environment: A Case Of The European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Özkan İmamoÄŸlu

    (Amasya Üniversitesi)

Abstract

With the acceleration of digitalization particularly alongside advances in information Technologies the migration of a wide range of activities to digital environments has become inevitable. Traditional shopping habits are increasingly giving way to online platforms where innovative approaches continually emerge. Thanks to the diffusion of digital technologies, consumers gain the ability to quickly compare and select products suited to their needs from a broad set of options. This transformation compels national and international firms to operate under more competitive conditions. Consequently, the implications of digitalization for the economy and trade should be regarded as strategically important. Extraordinary circumstances such as global pandemics further amplify firms’ need to leverage digital technologies to reach customers. In parallel with advances in financial technologies, digitalization is driving rapid and profound transformation in the financial sector; this change affects not only modes of service delivery but also the structural dynamics of international trade. Novel business models enabled by financial digitalization stand out as a decisive driving force in the transformation of traditional trade structures. The spread of digital payment systems and mobile banking can increase the speed and efficiency of commercial transactions, thereby influencing export and import performance. At the same time, aligning financial digitalization with environmental sustainability objectives and enabling a transition to lower‑carbon financial architectures through digital solutions should be expected.On the other hand, the expansion of e‑commerce volumes can exacerbate environmental pollution stemming from energy use and carbon emissions. The infrastructural components of digitalization generate high energy demand; data centers, cloud computing infrastructures, and continuously operating servers consume substantial amounts of electricity. Especially in developing countries, energy‑intensive implementations of digitalization can widen the ecological footprint and diminish the visibility of potential environmental benefits. As e‑commerce becomes more widespread, increased logistics activity can also raise transport‑related carbon emissions.The environmental impacts of financial digitalization exhibit a complex pattern; the direction of these impacts varies depending on the quality of digital infrastructure, the composition of energy sources used, and whether the regulatory framework is oriented toward sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Özkan İmamoÄŸlu, 2026. "Reflections Of Financial Digitalization On Foreign Trade And The Environment: A Case Of The European Union," Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 42(42), pages 57-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:42:y:2025:i:42:p:57-76
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2025-V42-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon/article/view/1722
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.econ.2025-V42-04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Freund & Diana Weinhold, 2002. "The Internet and International Trade in Services," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 236-240, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia Kotnik & Eva Hagsten, 2018. "ICT use as a determinant of export activity in manufacturing and service firms: Multi-country evidence," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 103-128.
    2. Yi Li, 2020. "Internet Development and Structural Transformation: Evidence from China," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    3. Erik Marel & Ben Shepherd, 2013. "Services Trade, Regulation and Regional Integration: Evidence from Sectoral Data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(11), pages 1393-1405, November.
    4. Carolina Lennon, 2008. "Trade in services and trade in goods: differences and complementarities," Working Papers halshs-00586223, HAL.
    5. Hildegunn K. Nordås & Dorothée Rouzet, 2017. "The Impact of Services Trade Restrictiveness on Trade Flows," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1155-1183, June.
    6. Jie Duan & Zengxi Hu, 2024. "Internet linkage and international trade: From the perspective of risk alleviation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(8), pages 3551-3577, August.
    7. Gopalan, Sasidaran & Reddy, Ketan & Sasidharan, Subash, 2022. "Does digitalization spur global value chain participation? Firm-level evidence from emerging markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Al-Abdali, Abid, 2005. "التجارة الالكترونية في الدول الاسلامية- الواقع - التحديات - الآمال [E-Commerce in OIC members: Facts - Challenges - Prospects]," MPRA Paper 51065, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. José Anson & Mauro Boffa, 2018. "Consumer Arbitrage in Cross-Border E-commerce," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/17, European University Institute.
    10. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Nadia Doytch & Christophe Schinckus & Thanh Dinh Su, 2024. "Mobile and internet usage, institutions and the trade balance: Evidence from African countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2230-2264, April.
    11. Sèna K. Gnangnon, 2021. "Aid for Trade and services export diversification in recipient countries," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 189-225, June.
    12. Carballo, Jerónimo & Rodriguez Chatruc, Marisol & Salas Santa, Catalina & Volpe Martincus, Christian, 2022. "Online business platforms and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Rosario Crinò, 2010. "Service Offshoring and White-Collar Employment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 77(2), pages 595-632.
    14. Asier Minondo, 2014. "The Relationship Between Export Status And Productivity In Services: A Firm-Level Analysis For Spain," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(S1), pages 138-146, December.
    15. Massimo Riccaboni & Alessandro Rossi & Stefano Schiavo, 2013. "Global networks of trade and bits," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 8(1), pages 33-56, April.
    16. Chu Ping Lo, 2024. "Digitalization, AI Intensity, and International Trade," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 25(1), pages 251-273, May.
    17. Michele Imbruno & Joël Cariolle & Jaime de Melo, 2025. "Digital connectivity and firm participation in foreign markets: An exporter-based bilateral analysis," Post-Print hal-05570207, HAL.
    18. Joël Cariolle & Michele Imbruno & Jaime de Melo, 2020. "Bilateral digital connectivity and firm participation in export markets," Working Papers hal-03182438, HAL.
    19. Njangang, Henri & Beleck, Alim & Tadadjeu, Sosson & Kamguia, Brice, 2022. "Do ICTs drive wealth inequality? Evidence from a dynamic panel analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    20. Henri Njangang & Alim Beleck & Sosson Tadadjeu & Brice Kamguia, 2021. "Do ICTs drive wealth inequality? Evidence from a dynamic panel analysis," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 21/057, African Governance and Development Institute..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:42:y:2025:i:42:p:57-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.