Author
Abstract
The reporting technique that reflects the relationship between businesses' strategies, financial performance, environmental and managerial activities and social and economic structure is called integrated reporting. Focusing on the process of creating corporate value, integrated reporting is a reporting technique that reflects the organization's strategy as a whole by establishing interaction between financial and non-financial information. Integrated reporting is considered as the reporting technique of the future. This study examined the 2022 integrated annual reports of Vakıfbank, Halkbank, Yapı Kredi and Akbank, which publish integrated reports on the Integrated Reporting Turkey Network (ERTA) platform, in terms of their compliance with the guidelines and content elements specified by the International Integrated Reporting Council within the framework of integrated reporting. Vakıfbank and Yapı Kredi issued their first integrated reports in 2019, while Halkbank and Akbank issued their first integrated reports in 2020. It was observed that the banks prepared reports in accordance with the integrated reporting framework and that the capital items included in the integrated reporting framework were included in detail in the reports. The top five priorities of the banks are similar in terms of digital transformation, innovation and customer satisfaction. It was concluded that Vakıfbank's integrated report is richer in terms of capital items and created values compared to other banks. In addition, when we compared the integrated reports of each bank within the framework of the guidelines, it was observed that the integrated reports of Halkbank and Akbank were more compliant with the principle of brevity and conciseness. When the outputs of capital items are evaluated, it is seen that Yapıkredi and Vakıfbank are more effective and efficient.
Suggested Citation
Meltem GÜL, 2025.
"A Comparative Analysis Of The Applicability Of Integrated Reporting In Private And Public Banks,"
Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 39(39), pages 53-73, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:buseco:v:39:y:2025:i:39:p:53-73
DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2025-V39-04
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:39:y:2025:i:39:p:53-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.