IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Monopsony’ in the Market for Nurses? A Semiparametric Note

Listed author(s):
  • Mukherjee, D

Despite shortage, labor market for registered nurses is often considered as an example of monopsony. A series of empirical papers examine the validity of this ‘monopsony power’ argument and investigate any possibility of ‘monopsonistic exploitation’ in such market. The exploitation can be viewed from different angles – salary or workload. High concentration of the hospitals (leading to monopsony or oligopsony) in the local areas as well as low mobility of the nurses across jobs are claimed to give rise to such exploitation. Exploitation, if present, can aggravate the problem of shortage because a high turnover rate is also observed in such labor market. This paper uses semiparametric regression to examine the ‘monopsonistic exploitation’ argument from the view points of registered nurses’ salary as well as work load and finds only limited support in favor of the exploitation argument. Hospital concentration does not seem to cause any problem as far ‘exploitation’ motive is concerned. However, lack of mobility on part of the nurses seems to impact their salary or work load.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access usually restricted to subscribers. Free on line subscription for universities from low and middle income countries: See

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Euro-American Association of Economic Development in its journal Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies.

Volume (Year): 11 (2011)
Issue (Month): 2 ()

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:11:y2011:i:2_3
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:11:y2011:i:2_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (M. Carmen Guisan)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.