IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/journl/y2018i2p133-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecotourism and Alternative Livelihood Strategies in Cameroon’s Protected Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Vyasha Harilal

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • Tembi M Tichaawa

    (University of Johannesburg)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the alternative livelihood strategies that local community members utilise to insulate themselves against the fragmented nature of the tourism industry. The study employed a mixed method research approach, based on two case study areas (the Mount Cameroon National Park and the Douala Edéa Wildlife Reserve) in Cameroon. Semi-structured questionnaires were administered to 383 households, collectively, in the two study areas, and in-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted with key informants. Key findings of the study suggest that many locals engage primarily in various agricultural activities as a livelihood strategy. Although the ecotourism activities present an opportunity in which the locals can engage, it is necessary to secure alternate forms of generating income, due to the seasonality and resultant instability of the industry. The extent to which the communities are impacted upon by ecotourism differs in each case study area. The study advises destination managers to devise plans, policy and strategies that will valorise the sector and facilitate participative management, including the local communities in decision-making processes and in the implementation of ecotourism in their communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Vyasha Harilal & Tembi M Tichaawa, 2018. "Ecotourism and Alternative Livelihood Strategies in Cameroon’s Protected Areas," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue Special i, pages 133-148, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2018:i:2:p:133-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/euroeconomica/article/view/5180/4557
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2018:i:2:p:133-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Nuta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.