IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/journl/y2018i1p62-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Customer Satisfaction in SBI and ICICI- Application of Mann-Whitney Rank Sum U-Test

Author

Listed:
  • Selvakumar M.

    (Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College)

  • Sathyalakshmi V.

    (Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College)

  • Mariappan M.

    (Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College)

  • Mohammed Abubakkar Siddique R.

    (Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College)

Abstract

Customers have become the lifeblood of any organization. Without customers, organizations would not exist let alone survive in this competitive global environment. Banks depend on sufficient and sustaining profitability to survive in the global business world. Customers are the source of banks’ profitability. By satisfying the customer, the bank is able to retain the customer and reap maximum benefits from the relationship which ultimately leads to higher profitability. Customer satisfaction has therefore evolved as a strategic business initiative which banks cannot ignore and retention of the bank customer has become one of the most important objectives of the overall marketing strategy of any bank. Customer satisfaction has been one of the main concerns of banks of late. This has been necessitated by the stiff competition in the banking industry. Banks are striving hard to offer quality services and products in a bid to maintain existing customers and woo new ones as well. Customers on the hand want the best value for their money so they are always coming around to get the best services.

Suggested Citation

  • Selvakumar M. & Sathyalakshmi V. & Mariappan M. & Mohammed Abubakkar Siddique R., 2018. "Comparison of Customer Satisfaction in SBI and ICICI- Application of Mann-Whitney Rank Sum U-Test," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1(37), pages 62-79, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2018:i:1:p:62-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/euroeconomica/article/view/4605/4489
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2018:i:1:p:62-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Nuta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.