IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2020i1p177-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Asymmetric Cointegration between Real Wage, Labour Productivity and Job Opportunity in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Habanabakize

    (North-West University)

Abstract

Labour productivity and real wage are two dynamic economic indicators that, among many others, influence employment changes. Their effects on employment or job opportunities can either be positive or negative. This study investigates the asymmetric cointegration between real wage, labour productivity and job opportunity in South Africa between 1994 and 2018. The used methodology includes the application of a non-linear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model, ECM and the dynamic multipliers. The obtained results from the bound testing suggested the existence of a long run relationship among the underlined variables. The estimated NARDL model revealed that real wage and labour productivity asymmetrically influence job opportunity dynamism. While positive component of productivity dominates over negative components; negative component of real wage dominates the positive component leading. Thus, labour productivity growth creates job opportunities whilst increase in real wage leads to a decline in the job opportunity. The study, therefore, recommends improvement in both labour productivity capacity through skills enhancement and real wage management through currency strengthening.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Habanabakize, 2021. "Testing Asymmetric Cointegration between Real Wage, Labour Productivity and Job Opportunity in South Africa," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 17(1), pages 177-191, FEBRUARY.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2020:i:1:p:177-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/393/1139
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2020:i:1:p:177-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.