IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2019i3p335-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Art of Valuing SMEs in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Louise van Scheers

    (University of South Africa)

  • Thea Visse

    (University of South Africa)

Abstract

Aim. There is no formal structured market where the most correct values of SMEs could be determined therefore valuing SME type businesses is more of an art than a science. The aim of this research was to obtain a better understanding and knowledge of the appropriate valuation methods and value factors contributing to the most correct market value of SME type businesses. Problem investigated. The problem emanates from the fact that SMEs cannot properly be appraised, and a value be attached to it is the effect of a slow transfer of skills and a slow growing SME sector in the South Africa economy. Methodology. Quantitative paradigm was deemed appropriate for the primary research. The goal was to interview 10 different SME business brokers, 30 SME buyers and 30 SME sellers in order to conduct a creditable investigation and recommendation. Research Findings & Conclusion. The conducted research confirmed that strategic value contributing factors for selling an SME are recognised by the general market. Generic valuation method for five types of SMEs, namely: Supermarket, restaurant, liquor store, coffee shop and hardware shop were created. Significance of the research for South African SMEs. SMEs play a vital role in the economy of South Africa, and therefore, their sustainability is crucial. This study will indicate to SME owners how to value their SME

Suggested Citation

  • Louise van Scheers & Thea Visse, 2019. "The Art of Valuing SMEs in South Africa," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 15(3), pages 335-353, JUNE.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2019:i:3:p:335-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/5310/4959
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2019:i:3:p:335-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.