IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2019i2p133-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Career Progression of Black African Middle Managers: The South African Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sive-Thina Mayiya

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • Chris Schachtebeck

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • Chuma Diniso

    (University of Johannesburg)

Abstract

The primary objective of this research is to assess the perceptions of black African middle managers on barriers to career progression. While a number of studies have investigated barriers to career progression among previously disadvantaged individuals, no study has focused on the perceptions of middle managers on the barriers to career progression amongst black Africans in the workplace. The study was qualitative in nature, employing a purposive sampling approach. Data was collected by means of semi-structured interviews amongst 18 black African middle managers in two major South African banks. Results indicate that a lack of exposure to senior managerial duties, lack of career guidance and support, demographic composition of senior management, as well as perceived unequal career opportunities present barriers to career progression. The value of the research lies in the practical changes banks can make to Human Resource practices and policies to overcome current challenges. The paper is of value to managers and HR professionals in the banking sector by addressing a major South African labour market issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Sive-Thina Mayiya & Chris Schachtebeck & Chuma Diniso, 2019. "Barriers to Career Progression of Black African Middle Managers: The South African Perspective," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 15(2), pages 133-147, APRIL.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2019:i:2:p:133-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/5243/4876
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2019:i:2:p:133-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.