IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2018i3p49-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency of Governance Model and Ownership Structure of Ukrainian Seaports

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Kischak

    (V.O.Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University)

  • Tatiana Porudeyeva

    (V.O.Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University)

  • Kateryna Glubochenko

    (V.O.Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the differences and efficiency in governance style of public and private owned seaports in Ukraine. Observation and comparative analysis of models of public and private seaports ownership in the Ukrainian context, considering the experience of other countries, conclude that a private ownership model for seaports is more flexible in conditions of modern political and economic transformations in Ukraine. Private seaports have higher levels of investment attraction and better financial results than public seaports. Worldwide experience in port infrastructure privatization demonstrates that seaports governed according to private ownership models are predominantly much more effective than public-owned seaports particularly in style of cooperation with investors and possibility of rapid development due to investment attraction. However, the current Ukrainian legislature predominantly considers seaports as the objects for concession in order to save public ownership of seaports. This investigation attempts to contribute to future studies that relate to an important issue such as efficiency of Ukrainian seaports in global economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Kischak & Tatiana Porudeyeva & Kateryna Glubochenko, 2018. "Efficiency of Governance Model and Ownership Structure of Ukrainian Seaports," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 14(3), pages 49-58, JUNE.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2018:i:3:p:49-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/4613/4465
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2018:i:3:p:49-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.