IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2015i6p50-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Current Approaches of Land Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Mihaela Onica

    (Dunarea de Jos University)

  • Carmen Mihaela Cretu

    (Danubius University of Galati)

  • Florentina Moisescu

    (Dunarea de Jos University)

  • Nicoleta Constandache

    (Danubius University of Galati)

Abstract

Land evaluation is a topical issue, especially now when people speak increasingly more about population growth and its need for new living spaces. In this sense the land evaluation methodology direct comparison and extraction method, always remain timeless. The two methods were aimed for more accurate determination of assessed land value. Following application of the two methods, respecting International Valuation Standards, recommendations and work methodology recommended by ANEVAR, it was concluded that the best method of valuing land in question is the direct comparison method.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Mihaela Onica & Carmen Mihaela Cretu & Florentina Moisescu & Nicoleta Constandache, 2015. "The Current Approaches of Land Evaluation," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(6), pages 50-57, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2015:i:6:p:50-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/3089/2979
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduard Dinu & Stefania-Cristina Curea, 2009. "The Relevance Of Discriminatory Analysis For The Evolution Of Shares Byone Issuing On Stock Exchange Market," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 5(05(534)(s), pages 14-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2015:i:6:p:50-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.