IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2015i4p106-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IFRS Adoption, Firm Traits and Audit Timeliness: Evidence from Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Musa Inuwa Fodio

    (Nasarawa State University)

  • Victor Chiedu Oba

    (Nasarawa State University)

  • Abiodun Bamidele Olukoju

    (University Oye-Ekiti)

  • Ahmed Abubakar Zik-rullahi

    (University of Abuja)

Abstract

Audit timeliness is an important ingredient of quality financial reporting. Stale information might only benefit little to stakeholders in their decision making process. With the recent adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards in Nigeria, the work of the auditor has seemingly become complicated. The question then emerges, if such adoption affects the timeliness of audit reports. This study empirically investigates the impact of IFRS adoption and other associated explanatory variables on audit timeliness in Nigerian deposit money banks for the period 2010 to 2013. Panel regression analysis reveals a positive significant impact of IFRS adoption on audit timeliness. Results also indicate that firm age, firm size and auditor firm type are significant predictors of audit timeliness in Nigeria deposit money banks. The study recommends that auditor firms should make stringent efforts to acclimatize with the complexities of the IFRS transition process so as to reduce audit report delays. Also reporting agencies should come up with regulations, deadlines and benchmarks for issuance of independent audit reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Musa Inuwa Fodio & Victor Chiedu Oba & Abiodun Bamidele Olukoju & Ahmed Abubakar Zik-rullahi, 2015. "IFRS Adoption, Firm Traits and Audit Timeliness: Evidence from Nigeria," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(4), pages 106-119, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2015:i:4:p:106-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/2866/2704
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2015:i:4:p:106-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.