IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2015i2p273-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Study on Accounting and Tax Differences in the Case of an Economic Entity

Author

Listed:
  • Valeriu Laurentiu Onose

    (CECCAR)

  • Ecaterina Necsulescu

    (Danubius University of Galati)

Abstract

Often enough, the definitions in tax regulations are not unique, and they can differ even within the fiscal legislation from one title to another. Thus the accounting regulations define the net turnover tax code, but at the same time it brings different definitions of turnover in terms of added value. The turnover for professionals in accounting is an indicator used to represent the value and the synthetic of the achieved sales by an economic unit during a certain period or a business segment. Also the fiscal elements come to generate a new identity of the taxable result, totally different from the accounting result. There are found clear value differences between accounting and tax perspective on the outcome in terms of operating profit and expenses. These differences at the level of operating costs continue to affect key indicators of the structure of the profit account and loss until determining the gross profit, which differs in the accounting vision compared to the gross profit in the fiscal vision.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeriu Laurentiu Onose & Ecaterina Necsulescu, 2015. "Empirical Study on Accounting and Tax Differences in the Case of an Economic Entity," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(2), pages 273-286, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2015:i:2:p:273-286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/2822/2411
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2015:i:2:p:273-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.