IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2013i3p60-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the Resulted Strategies from the SWOT and the SPACE (Electricity Company as Case Study)

Author

Listed:
  • Abolfazl Sherafat

    (University of Tehran, Iran)

  • Khadijeh Yavari

    (Yazd University, Iran)

  • Sayyed Mohammad Reza Davoodi

    (Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)

  • Nima Bozorgzadeh

    (Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)

Abstract

The present study was aimed to compare the implementation of two models in terms of strategic planning. In order to this, firstly, several field studies have been done in terms of the SWOT and the SPACE analysis. In the next step, a team of the middle and senior managers that have studied in terms of SWOT analysis seek to identify the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats and then develop their related strategies. They also develop and indicate the SPACE questionnaire. Based on the results of this questionnaire and determining the organization’s strategic position, they strive to develop the appropriate strategies. Finally, the strategies that have been derived from these models were compared to each other and their strengths and weaknesses were analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Abolfazl Sherafat & Khadijeh Yavari & Sayyed Mohammad Reza Davoodi & Nima Bozorgzadeh, 2013. "Comparing the Resulted Strategies from the SWOT and the SPACE (Electricity Company as Case Study)," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(3), pages 60-69, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2013:i:3:p:60-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/1829/1599
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2013:i:3:p:60-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.