Author
Listed:
- Marius Silviu Burlui
(Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)
- Alexandru Capatina
(Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)
Abstract
The evolving dynamics of the labor market have raised expectations regarding both the continuous development of human capital and the effectiveness of human resource management practices. In response, higher education institutions are increasingly required to modernize their internal performance evaluation mechanisms in order to enhance organizational efficiency, transparency, and employee motivation. The transition from traditional appraisal methods to innovative, often digitalized, evaluation systems has the potential to improve objectivity and streamline processes; however, it also introduces challenges related to employees’ perceptions of fairness and practical relevance. This study examines the perceptions of Technical, Economic, and Socio-Administrative (TESA) staff within higher education institutions regarding an innovative performance evaluation system. In particular, it explores the relationship between the clarity with which evaluation criteria are communicated and employees’ perceptions of the system’s fairness. The analysis highlights both the perceived benefits and the obstacles associated with the implementation of such systems. The findings provide valuable insights for the development of transparent, equitable, and development-oriented human resource management practices in the academic sector, supporting more effective alignment between organizational objectives and employee expectations.
Suggested Citation
Marius Silviu Burlui & Alexandru Capatina, 2026.
"Rethinking Performance Evaluation in Higher Education: Insights from Technical, Economic and Administrative Staff,"
Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 86-93.
Handle:
RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2026:i:1:p:86-93
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409578
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2026:i:1:p:86-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.