IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Butterfly Effect on the Agricultural Bank System at the Grass-Roots Level




  • Zhang JIAN

    () (The College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China)


The competition power of the Agricultural Bank of China has been dropping down for several years. The reason is that banks at the grass-roots level don’t think much of managing the subtle links. The paper uses the theory of butterfly effect in Chaos for reference to discusses the risks existed in the Agricultural Bank of China at the grass-roots level such as the credit risk, the incomplete internal control, the loose accounting system, the disorder market competitiveness, the brain drain, the weak service consciousness, the financial innovation lag and the unbalanced development. Finally eight pieces of advice are brought forward as the measures against the eight butterfly effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu QINXIAN & Zhang JIAN, 2009. "The Butterfly Effect on the Agricultural Bank System at the Grass-Roots Level," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 253-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2009:i:1:p:253-258

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. David Audretsch & Max Keilbach, 2005. "Entrepreneurship capital and regional growth," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 39(3), pages 457-469, September.
    2. Brennan, Niamh, 2005. "Corporate governance: Accountability, enterprise and international comparisons, 2005," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 425-428.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    the butterfly effect; the chaos; the Duffing-Holmes model; the agricultural bank system at the grass-roots level;

    JEL classification:

    • N50 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2009:i:1:p:253-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gianina Mihai). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.