IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology of Diagnosing Enterprise Activity and Techniques of Diagnosis


  • Mihaela Cristina Onica

    () (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)


The diagnosing methodology, on one hand, should allow liberation of the main elements for elaboration of the survey and, besides that, for thorough research in case of abnormalities and, on the other hand, should neglect the accidental elements which do not have an utility to the studied field. This double necessity drives the analyst’s efforts in eliminating the difficulties of diagnosing method, which should avoid two possible limits, that is: performing a very analytical and expensive survey when compared to the information it provides or elaborating a too global survey, which can cause some omissions, among which some important issues for the final consideration and for the action plans which are to be set can be lost. Therefore, only a rigorous activity diagnosis method can convince the study beneficiary as to the competence and value of the specialist expert called and of the fact that the result of analysis does not include a multitude of useless, unessential information.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Cristina Onica, 2006. "Methodology of Diagnosing Enterprise Activity and Techniques of Diagnosis," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 103-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2006:i:1:p:103-106

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Agnès Bénassy-Quéré & Nicolas Gobalraja & Alain Trannoy, 2005. "Tax Competition and Public Input," Working Papers 2005-08, CEPII research center.
    2. Agnès Bénassy-Quéré & Amina Lahrèche-Revil & Lionel Fontagné, 2003. "Tax Competition and Foreign Direct Investment," Working Papers 2003-17, CEPII research center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2006:i:1:p:103-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gianina Mihai). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.