IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v8y2014i2p58-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations On The Effects Of The Donation Contract

Author

Listed:
  • Bujorel Florea

Abstract

The study starts from the reality according to which the donation contract belongs to the gratuitous acts (liberalities), on which the law­maker lays special emphasis as compared with the onerous acts. This difference in treatment consists in the fact that liberalities are more susceptible than the onerous acts to produce abuses and to harm the legitimate interests of the person who disposes and of his family. Taking into account all these, the author analyses the rights and the obligations of the parties of the donation contract, as well as the juridical means available to them in the case when the other party does not fulfill, with guilt, his obligations. At the same time, the study presents also the publicity formalities that have to be done in relation with the object of the donation, in the view of providing the opposability of the donated object against the third parties. The article presents viewpoints from doctrine and jurisprudence relative to various juridical situations as concerns the liability of the parties that are guilty for the nonfulfillment of the obligations resulted from the donation contract. Also, the author presents his personal opinions as regards the unregulated and controversial situations in the approached matter.

Suggested Citation

  • Bujorel Florea, 2014. "Considerations On The Effects Of The Donation Contract," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 58-64, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:2:p:58-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/155-Article-Text-291-1-10-20150302.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:2:p:58-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.