IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v13y2019i1p105-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relation Between Private Interational Law And Constitutional Law In Federal Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Horea Crișan

Abstract

This article is exploring and analogy, its purpose is not to identify or comment on the present rules or practice of private international law in federal systems, but rather to examine the ideas and theories relating to private international law which have been developed in these states as a result of their federal structure, the ways in which the ideas of private international law have been affected by or are part of the constitutional ordering of the federal systems. These ideas are operative and they may still be usefully applied by way analogy in the context of the emerging idea of international federalism. The idea involves secondary norms which deal with distribution of regulatory authority between states and between the international and national realms. By looking at the effect on private international law of equivalent norms within federal systems, the article identifies a conceptual framework which provides the foundations for a new perspective on international private law.

Suggested Citation

  • Horea Crișan, 2019. "The Relation Between Private Interational Law And Constitutional Law In Federal Systems," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 105-109, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:105-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/414-Article-Text-806-1-10-20190710.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    constitutional law; private international law; federal systems;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:105-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.