IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v11y2017i1p313-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Justice Denied & Justice Delayed" - Efficiency Of The Contemporary Legal System In India

Author

Listed:
  • Retika Yadav

Abstract

Justice concerns everyone and nobody should be deprived of it. As Rawls said there can be distributive justice only when you strip your identities while formulating legal rules. This paper is influenced by his theory and pin points some of the most common problems faced by the children of the Indian society. It discusses the evolution of the legal system in India since its independence and how the efficiency of the legal system varies in relation to different issues regarding children. Lastly the paper will provide reasons for the downfall of the legal system, ways how it can be reduced and recommendations for the development of child rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Retika Yadav, 2017. ""Justice Denied & Justice Delayed" - Efficiency Of The Contemporary Legal System In India," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 313-327, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:313-327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/317-Article-Text-614-1-10-20170609.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gauging; effectiveness; law-making; judicial application of law; legal consciousness Pages: 313-327;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K1 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:313-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.