IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/southh/2026v5a209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content validity for the identification of occupational and ergonomic risks in the management of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Author

Listed:
  • Yanet Ortega Dugrot
  • Juliet Suárez Oceguera
  • Susana Solís Solís
  • Osmany Alonso Ayala
  • Daimarelis Guerra del Valle
  • Jacqueline Fidelina Valdivieso Romero

Abstract

Introduction: The team of professionals involved in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography experiences occupational and ergonomic risks, for which validation instruments are required to facilitate the identification of these risks, in order to prevent occupational diseases. Objective: To validate the instruments for identifying occupational and ergonomic risks in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, using statistical methods of competence coefficient, Aiken's V and calculation of confidence intervals. Methods: Content validity was assessed using expert criteria based on Aiken's V. The study was conducted from February to April 2025. The experts' competency coefficient was taken into account. Content validation was performed using Aiken's V and its confidence intervals. Results: The instrument was comprehensively validated, with a score of 0.98 for occupational hazards (98.21%), while the ergonomic hazards instrument validation yielded an overall score of 0.99 for 98.93%, which is considered good, above 75%. The confidence intervals confirm the study's validity. Conclusions: Content validation was performed, which favors reliable research results. Specialist suggestions were taken into account based on the clarity and comprehension of the occupational risk instrument.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:southh:2026v5a209
DOI: 10.56294/shp2026391
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:southh:2026v5a209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://shp.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.