IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2026v4a11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of pharmacological treatment for closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm newborns: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Alberto Cerquin Sangay
  • Enzo Renatto Bazualdo Fiorini
  • Segundo Bueno Ordóñez

Abstract

Introduction: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) represents a relevant clinical problem due to its hemodynamic implications, especially in premature newborns, which has motivated multiple studies on its management. Currently, pharmacological treatment is one way to solve this problem, but there is no clear consensus as to which treatment is the most effective and least risky. Objective: The aim of this study was to find the drug with the highest rate of efficacy in PDA closure and with the least adverse effects. Methods: A descriptive systematic review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in SCOPUS, PUBMED, SCIELO, COCHRANE and LILACS databases. Results: After applying certain inclusion criteria, we obtained a total of 20 studies, most of which were systematic reviews and cohort studies. Among the studies reviewed, drugs such as indomethacin, ibuprofen, paracetamol and betamethasone have been used, finding that among the first three there is no statistically significant difference in efficacy. Closure rates and adverse effects vary considerably in the different studies, depending on factors such as dose, route of administration and gestational age of the neonate. Conclusions: The studies reviewed show that both ibuprofen and indomethacin have similar efficacy in PDA closure in preterm infants. Indomethacin is associated with higher risks of adverse effects. Acetaminophen appears to be a safe and effective alternative, with a superior safety profile compared to NSAIDs.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2026v4a11
DOI: 10.62486/sic2026299
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2026v4a11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.