IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2025v3a22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Satisfaction with a deglutition assessment procedure: cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Filipe Teixeira
  • Adriana Sentieiro
  • Andreia Cunha
  • Edgar Pires
  • Miriam Silva
  • Beatriz Miguéis

Abstract

Introduction: oropharyngeal dysphagia has a high prevalence worldwide. Elderly people are more likely to develop dysphagia, especially those who have had a stroke. Dysphagia increases the risk of aspiration pneumonia and mortality after stroke by 4 times. At the Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital of the Amadora-Sintra Local Health Unit, the Volume-Viscosity Clinical Exploration Method is used to assess swallow early. Objective: to assess the level of satisfaction among patients diagnosed with stroke, admitted to the Adult Emergency Department and the Neurology Service at this hospital, regarding the execution of the deglutition assessment procedure. Method: this is a cross-sectional study. A specific questionnaire was created for patients to respond to. Data were collected between March 5 and September 5, 2024. Quantitative data analysis was performed. Results: the average age of the patients was 62,52 years, with 63,46 % female. Out of 11 questions, 10 had higher than 84 % of positive responses. 96,15 % of patients reported satisfaction with the Nurse’s care. Patients highlighted the importance of efficient communication from the Nurse, ensuring their privacy and receiving information about the benefits of deglutition assessment. These findings are present in other studies on patient satisfaction. Conclusions: patients expressed satisfaction with the execution of the procedure, as they considered it to contribute to their adaptation to a new life condition.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a22
DOI: 10.62486/sic2025232
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.