IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/rehabi/v2y2022ip16id16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of the treatment applied in the smoking cessation consultation

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Alberto Vitón Fleitas
  • Mildrey Díaz Herrera
  • Osmaiki Martin Junco
  • Yadira Méndez Borrego
  • Yenisleidy González Borges

Abstract

Introduction: WHO estimates that approximately one third of the world's population smokes, and the use of traditional medicine in the treatment of tobacco dependence is recognized. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment administered in the smoking cessation consultation, medical office 9 of Puerto Esperanza, Viñales in 2018. Methods: Observational, analytical cohort study. It involved 90 smokers who met the inclusion criteria. Participants were divided into three study groups using simple random sampling. They were subjected to psychological techniques, auriculotherapy, and homeopathy. Theoretical, empirical and statistical methods were used, and expressed in absolute and relative frequencies. Variables such as age and sex, educational level, smoking habits, treatment effectiveness, and number of cigarettes smoked before and after treatment were used. The results were presented in tables for better interpretation. Results: There was a male predominance. The age groups were different in the three study groups. Patients with intermediate technical education were predominant. A total of 51 patients quit smoking (56,6 %). The best results were obtained with the use of homeopathy with 27 patients (30 %). A total of 19 patients (21,1 %) were able to quit smoking using auriculotherapy. In contrast, only 5 patients (5,56 %) were able to quit using psychological techniques. Conclusions: Treatment with traditional and natural medicine showed better results with the application of homeopathy and auriculotherapy.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:2:y:2022:i::p:16:id:16
DOI: 10.56294/ri202216
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:rehabi:v:2:y:2022:i::p:16:id:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ri.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.