IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/procee/v3y2025ip1056294piii2025366id1056294piii2025366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing and Conscientious Objection: An Analysis of Safe Abortion in the Context of Law 27.610

Author

Listed:
  • Romina Fabiana Maldonado

Abstract

Introduction: Abortion in Argentina has been a subject of historical debate, crossed by legal, ethical and cultural tensions. Since the incorporation of non-punishable abortion into the Penal Code in 1921, access was restricted by conservative legal interpretations. With the enactment of Law 27,610 in 2020, which regulates the voluntary termination of pregnancy up to 14 weeks of gestation, a significant advance in sexual and reproductive rights was marked. However, the implementation of the law faces challenges, particularly in relation to Conscientious Objection (CO), a right that, if misapplied, can hinder access to safe abortion. Development: The province of Santa Fe was a pioneer in implementing a registry of conscientious objectors to ensure a balance between the rights of health professionals and pregnant women. Although the registry improved the organization of services, it revealed problems such as the misuse of CO and the lack of sustained public policies. In the nursing field, the tension between the right to CO and ethical obligations reflects a challenge. Necessary actions include education and regulation to avoid obstructive practices, ensuring respectful and efficient care. Law 27,610 symbolizes progress in expanding rights but requires training and oversight strategies for effective implementation. It is crucial to ensure that CO does not interfere with access to services, balancing individual rights with the obligation to provide comprehensive care

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025366:id:1056294piii2025366
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:procee:v:3:y:2025:i::p:1056294piii2025366:id:1056294piii2025366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.