IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/podiat/2024v3a1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical and epidemiological results in the field of podiatry

Author

Listed:
  • Telmo Raul Aveiro-Róbalo

Abstract

Introduction: Podiatric sciences comprise a set of areas of knowledge that are part of diverse medical specialties. Its purpose is the diagnostic study and treatment of each of the conditions that involve the foot as an atomic and functional structure. Objective: To describe the clinical and epidemiological outcomes in the field of podiatry. Method: A narrative study was conducted. A search strategy was established, applying prestigious and scientifically supported data sources such as PubMed. Twenty-seven sources were collated for the development of this work. Development: Scientific evidence is demonstrated by levels of demonstration; in turn, it is matched to each of the article types. The ongoing study and gradual analysis of patient care is a way to measure and improve the quality of healthcare services. If, combined with the above, it is conducted with a scientific approach, the results obtained can have a greater impact on improving care. Communication and the doctor-patient relationship are key to successful treatment. Conclusions: The development of health research is key to scientific and technical advancement. Podiatry as a science requires concrete studies with clear evidence. Most of these studies focus on population and risk studies, where nail injuries, deformities, and chronic pain predominate. They also contribute to health promotion and prevention, as well as updating treatment protocols. All of this without losing sight of the ongoing study of academic training.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:podiat:2024v3a1
DOI: 10.56294/pod2024128
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:podiat:2024v3a1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pod.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.