IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/nursin/2025v4a38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mental health and work environment: feelings of psychologists in a mental health service

Author

Listed:
  • Enrique Noguera
  • José Niazoa
  • Misael Ron

Abstract

Introduction: According to Jung, the psychologist is a healer who suffers from his own wound, whose mask hides the shadow of his own feeling. The purpose of this research is to reveal the feeling of psychologists about their work process in a mental health center in 2025. Method: A methodological level was directed under the gaze of the post-positivist paradigm, with a qualitative approach, with a phenomenological-hermeneutic method, using as an instrument for collecting information a semi-structured interview script focused on depth, with psychologists as the research subjects Results: From the voices of the informants it can be revealed that their work environment generates discomfort and they feel vulnerable when their criteria as professionals are not respected. Regarding the effects of their work processes, they describe musculoskeletal ailments of the upper limbs, which they experience with difficult patients, in addition to this at a psychosocial level they present fatigue, isolation and mutism. Regarding self-care mechanisms in consultation, they refer to establishing clear limits, avoiding their own emotional processes and focusing on the patient. On the other hand, they feel comfortable with their work, but they have to bear the burden of family expectations that turn them into a god. Finally, they agree that life as a couple is somewhat complicated and that being a psychologist does not make it any better. Conclusion: Finally, they consider that mental health policies are necessary for the professional care of those who work with purely emotional demands.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:nursin:2025v4a38
DOI: 10.56294/nds2025159
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:nursin:2025v4a38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://nds.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.