IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/evitro/2024v3a22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of an entomopathogenic consortium for the control of mealybug (Planococcus citri) located on the María Auxiliadora campus of the Salesian Polytechnic University

Author

Listed:
  • Solange del Rocío Lituma Carriel

Abstract

Introduction: in the city of Guayaquil, the mealybug pest poses a threat to various plant species. Biological control strategies, such as the use of one of its natural predators, ladybugs, are also possible, as are other solutions such as the use of entomopathogenic fungi. Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of an entomopathogenic consortium consisting of the species Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, Lecanicillium lecanii, and Purpureocillium lilacinum against the mealybug species Planococcus citri in lemon plants. Method: the experimental strategy was carried out on the grounds of the Salesian Polytechnic University, María Auxiliadora campus. Lemon trees were infected with Planococcus citri for 4 to 6 months, two weeks before the application of the treatments. The 7 treatments, except for the application control, consisted of 3 different concentrations (200 %, 100 %, and 50 %) of the positive control (chemical detergent) and the entomopathogenic consortium. Results: the mortality rate of scale insects and the efficacy of the consortium were analyzed. Treatment 3 (100%) produced the highest mortality rate; while treatment 2, the positive control, and treatment 3, the entomopathogenic consortium, showed no significant differences in efficacy. In addition, chlorophyll was analyzed before and after treatment; treatment 3 showed significant differences compared to the positive control treatments. Conclusions: the entomopathogenic fungal consortium proved to be an effective alternative to chemical insecticides for controlling Planococcus citri, as higher mortality of the pest and a significant population reduction were observed with the use of this treatment compared to the negative and positive controls.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:evitro:2024v3a22
DOI: 10.56294/evk2024123
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:evitro:2024v3a22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://evk.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.