IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/ethaic/v1y2022ip22id22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Ethics in Terminal Patients: Dilemmas in the Use of AI for End-of-Life Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Ana María Chaves Cano

Abstract

Medical ethics in terminal patients faces unprecedented challenges with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in end-of-life decision-making. This article aims to analyze the ethical dilemmas arising from the use of AI in this context by exploring its implications for autonomy, dignity, and the humanization of palliative care. To this end, a literature review was conducted of articles in Spanish and English indexed in Scopus between 2018 and 2022, selecting studies that addressed the intersection of AI, bioethics, and palliative medicine. The results were organized into four thematic axes: patient autonomy and informed consent, algorithmic biases and equity in recommendations, dehumanization versus optimization of care, and legal and moral responsibility in automated decisions. It was identified that, although AI can improve the accuracy of forecasts and treatments, its implementation requires ethical safeguards to prevent the reduction of the doctor-patient relationship to a technical process. The conclusions highlight the need for regulatory frameworks that balance technological innovation with bioethical principles, prioritizing human dignity and the active participation of patients and families in end-of-life decisions.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:ethaic:v:1:y:2022:i::p:22:id:22
DOI: 10.56294/ai202222
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:ethaic:v:1:y:2022:i::p:22:id:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ai.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.