IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip756id1056294dm2025756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning-Based Quantification of Vesicoureteral Reflux with Enhancing Accuracy and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Muhyeeddin Alqaraleh
  • Mowafaq Salem Alzboon
  • Mohammad Subhi Al-Batah
  • Lana Yasin Al Aesa
  • Mohammed Hasan Abu-Arqoub
  • Rashiq Rafiq Marie
  • Firas Hussein Alsmadi

Abstract

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is traditionally assessed using subjective grading systems, leading to variability in diagnosis. This study explores the potential of machine learning to enhance diagnostic accuracy by analysing voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images. The objective is to develop predictive models that provide an objective and consistent approach to VUR classification. A total of 113 VCUG images were reviewed, with experts grading them based on VUR severity. Nine distinct image features were selected to build six predictive models, which were evaluated using 'leave-one-out' cross-validation. The analysis identified renal calyces’ deformation patterns as key indicators of high-grade VUR. The models—Logistic Regression, Tree, Gradient Boosting, Neural Network, and Stochastic Gradient Descent—achieved precise classifications with no false positives or negatives. High sensitivity to subtle patterns characteristic of different VUR grades was confirmed by substantial Area Under the Curve (AUC) values. This study demonstrates that machine learning can address the limitations of subjective VUR assessments, offering a more reliable and standardized grading system. The findings highlight the significance of renal calyces’ deformation as a predictor of severe VUR cases. Future research should focus on refining methodologies, exploring additional image features, and expanding the dataset to enhance model accuracy and clinical applicability.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:756:id:1056294dm2025756
DOI: 10.56294/dm2025756
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:756:id:1056294dm2025756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.