IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip744id1056294dm2025744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public opinion towards stuttering: The differentiated beliefs and reactions between Chilean men and women

Author

Listed:
  • Yasna Sandoval
  • Juana Roman-Zubeldia
  • Soledad Sacheri

Abstract

Introduction: Stuttering is a disorder that affects fluency and is associated with social stigma and negative beliefs. Public opinion about stuttering is fundamental to understanding the social and psychological dynamics faced by people who stutter. Beliefs and reactions to stuttering have been documented to vary across cultures, gender and age, which may influence understanding of the condition. Objective: To explore beliefs and reactions to stuttering in chilean men and women, and to assess whether gender influences public opinion about the condition. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, exploratory study. The culturally adapted survey 'the public opinion survey on human attributes-stuttering' was administered to 400 Chileans. Results: A high percentage of men (92.7%) and women (96.0%) believe that people with stuttering should hide their condition. Both sexes also share stigmatizing beliefs, although they recognize that people with stuttering can lead normal lives. In terms of reactions, both women and men expressed concern when someone stuttered, but also showed a willingness to behave normally in conversation. Conclusions: Beliefs and reactions to stuttering in Chile reflect a persistent stigma. Differences in perceptions may be influenced by socio-demographic factors such as gender, suggesting the need for educational interventions to promote better understanding of the condition.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:744:id:1056294dm2025744
DOI: 10.56294/dm2025744
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:744:id:1056294dm2025744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.