IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip729id1056294dm2025729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception and use of ChatGPT among university students. Analysis based on K-Modes

Author

Listed:
  • Darío Cervantes
  • Edgar Morales

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has transformed the educational landscape, with tools such as ChatGPT gaining popularity among university students. This study analyses the perception and use of ChatGPT in Ecuadorian higher education, exploring its impact on academic performance and associated ethical concerns. The objective was to examine how students from various universities and majors perceive the usefulness of ChatGPT in their academic activities. A non-probabilistic cross-sectional approach was employed, using a structured survey applied to 256 students from six Ecuadorian universities. The methodology included the use of the K-Modes algorithm to cluster the students' categorical responses, visualised through principal component analysis. The results revealed significant differences in the use of ChatGPT according to gender, university and career. Female and engineering students showed higher adoption. Four distinct groups of users were identified, reflecting diverse perceptions of the usefulness and risks of ChatGPT. The discussion addressed variability in ChatGPT adoption, highlighting factors such as technological access and ethical concerns. A tension was noted between perceived benefits and potential risks, such as over-reliance and plagiarism. In conclusion, the study highlights the importance of understanding students' perceptions of ChatGPT to effectively integrate these tools into higher education, while simultaneously addressing ethical concerns and encouraging responsible use of AI in academia.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:729:id:1056294dm2025729
DOI: 10.56294/dm2025729
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:729:id:1056294dm2025729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.