Author
Listed:
- Sandeep Raghuwanshi
- Arif Hasan
- Sushma R
- Reetika Agrawal
- Ardhendu Shekhar Singh
- Neeraj Kumar Dubey
- Prabhat Kumar
Abstract
Introduction: The research investigated the effects of ChatGPT, an AI-driven language model, on students and academic institutions. The analysis incorporated viewpoints from academics, research scholars, and graduate or postgraduate students. The increasing use of AI in education requires a comprehensive understanding of its potential benefits and drawbacks, especially within higher education and research. Methods: A thematic content analysis was used to investigate the viewpoints of 46 graduate and postgraduate students, 8 research scholars, and 4 educators. The investigation sought to find repeating themes and principal concepts concerning the influence of AI in educational environments. Results: The research examined remarks regarding the function of ChatGPT for students, researchers, and educators, pinpointing eight major themes. The most prevalent were Content Writing (45 mentions), Creation of Thought (35 references), and Collection of Information (33 mentions), underscoring ChatGPT’s influence on content development, ideation, and data organization. Additional themes encompassed Language Utilization, Innovation Generation, Model Development, Idea Formation, and Supportive Tools. The results demonstrated that ChatGPT is perceived as revolutionary for writing, cognitive processes, and information acquisition. Conclusions: The research determined that ChatGPT has considerable ramifications for students and universities, as revealed by thematic content analysis. It emphasized eight primary themes: content, creativity, language, tools, models, information, generations, and ideas. It highlighted AI as an augmentation of the human intellect while acknowledging the significance of human traits. The results highlighted the necessity for additional research into privacy issues, ethical considerations, and optimal procedures for incorporating AI in education. The report emphasized the necessity of recognizing both the benefits and drawbacks of AI in current research and higher education.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:676:id:1056294dm2025676
DOI: 10.56294/dm2025676
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:676:id:1056294dm2025676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.