IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip194id1056294dm2025194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic weed quantification in potato crops based on a modified convolutional neural network using drone images

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Vinueza
  • Lucía Sandoval-Pillajo
  • Adriana Giret-Boggino
  • Diego Trejo-España
  • Marco Pusdá-Chulde
  • Iván García-Santillán

Abstract

Identifying and quantifying weeds is a crucial aspect of agriculture for efficiently controlling them. Weeds compete with the crop for nutrients, minerals, physical space, sunlight, and water, causing problems in crops ranging from low production to economic losses and environmental deterioration of the land. Weed quantification is generally a manual process requiring significant time and precision. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) are very common in weed quantification. Thus, the purpose of this research is the adaptation of the ResNeXt50 CNN architecture for semantic segmentation tasks, focused on the automatic quantification of weeds (Broadleaf dock, Dandelion, Kikuyo grass, and other unidentified classes) in potato fields using RGB images acquired by the DJI Mavic 2 Pro drone. The analytical model was trained following the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) methodology using Python and the TensorFlow-Keras frameworks. The results indicate that the modified ResNeXt50 model presented a mean IoU of 0.7350, a performance comparable to the values reported by other authors considering fewer weed classes. The Student´s t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient were applied to contrast the weed coverage from the model predictions and the ground truth, indicating no statistically significant differences between both measurements in most weed classes.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:194:id:1056294dm2025194
DOI: 10.56294/dm2025194
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:194:id:1056294dm2025194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.