IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip1179id1056294dm20251179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Supervisory Approach to Building Ethical Digital Forensic Frameworks through Participatory Action Research

Author

Listed:
  • Arizona Firdonsyah
  • Purwanto
  • Imam Riadi
  • Mahrus Ali
  • Ammar Fauzan

Abstract

Introduction: the integrity of digital forensic case handling plays a crucial role in safeguarding the public interest. Breaches in ethical compliance within the forensic process can undermine the credibility of investigations and erode public trust in their outcomes. Methods: the Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach. The research engaged stakeholders from both academic and professional sectors. Data collection was conducted through comprehensive literature reviews and structured stakeholder discussions to ensure the resulting framework reflects both theoretical and practical considerations. Results: the study introduced the Supervisory Framework to Respect Ethics or we call it SUFREE, a model specifically designed to address ethical oversight in the digital forensic process, specific to conditions in Indonesia. The framework was developed through iterative consultation and validation involving relevant experts, aiming to ensure methodological robustness and applicability within the Indonesian setting. Conclusion: the SUFREE framework offers a structured, ethics-focused supervisory model expected to enhance the quality, integrity, and professionalism of digital forensic practices in Indonesia, thereby contributing to improved public trust in forensic investigations.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:1179:id:1056294dm20251179
DOI: 10.56294/dm20251179
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:1179:id:1056294dm20251179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.