IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip1103id1056294dm20251103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Proposal for the Design and Validation of Research Instruments Supported by Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Richar Jacobo Posso Pacheco
  • Rosangela Caicedo-Quiroz
  • Giceya Maqueira-Caraballo
  • Julio Barzola-Monteses
  • Laura Cristina Barba Miranda
  • Jorge Ricardo Amancha Gabela

Abstract

Introduction: the validity of data collection instruments is essential to ensure the quality and replicability of scientific studies; traditional methods require time, resources, and expert participation, making validation difficult. Objective: To develop a procedure for the design and validation of research instruments using Artificial Intelligence as a methodological support tool. Methods: an eight-phase model was designed, ranging from conceptual review and item formulation to linguistic evaluation, simulated rational validation, comprehension verification, internal consistency analysis, and structural optimization. Results: the process demonstrated applicability, technical coherence, and practical utility. ChatGPT 4.5 enabled the automation of analyses and the generation of content aligned with theoretical constructs, optimizing the preliminary validation phases. Conclusions: AI represents a viable alternative in resource-limited settings. While it does not replace classic empirical methods, it complements methodological rigor in key stages. Ethical and technical protocols must be established for its responsible use in scientific research.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:1103:id:1056294dm20251103
DOI: 10.56294/dm20251103
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:1103:id:1056294dm20251103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.