IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v4y2025ip1102id1056294dm20251102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliable prediction of industrial components Remaining Useful Life using Cox and Weibull models: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hamdi Alaoui Abdelhafid
  • Anwar Meddaoui
  • Ahmed En-nhaili

Abstract

Predicting the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of industrial equipment is a cornerstone of predictive maintenance strategies aimed at minimizing downtime and optimizing maintenance costs. This study presents a comparative evaluation of two prominent survival analysis techniques Cox Proportional Hazards (Cox PH) and the Weibull model for RUL prediction using the AI4I 2020 Predictive Maintenance Dataset. We implement a robust analytical framework incorporating Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariate survival modeling. Our methodology includes detailed data preprocessing, model validation using the C-index and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and the identification of significant predictors of failure. The results reveal that the Cox PH model outperforms the Weibull model in terms of flexibility, predictive accuracy, and capacity to handle multiple covariates. This work highlights the strengths and limitations of both models and emphasizes the superior applicability of the Cox PH model for complex industrial datasets. These findings offer actionable insights for developing more reliable, data-driven maintenance strategies in Industry 4.0 environments.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:1102:id:1056294dm20251102
DOI: 10.56294/dm20251102
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:4:y:2025:i::p:1102:id:1056294dm20251102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.