IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v3y2024ip.399id1056294dm2024399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposal of Competencies in Telehealth: A Mixed-Methods Study in the Biobío Region, Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Marcela Hechenleitner-Carvallo
  • Jacqueline Ibarra-Peso
  • Carlos Zúñiga-San Martín
  • Angélica Avendaño-Veloso
  • Eileen Sepúlveda-Valenzuela

Abstract

Introduction: Telehealth has become essential in the delivery of healthcare services, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: This study aims to identify the specific competencies needed for the effective implementation of telehealth in Biobío, Chile. Methods: A qualitative and quantitative validation of competencies was conducted. The qualitative phase included a focus group with professionals from various health areas to discuss and refine the competencies. The quantitative phase used the Telehealth Competency and Preparedness Perception Scale (EPPCT), employing a non-probabilistic convenience sampling (n=48) among health professionals in the Biobío region, Chile. Results: The qualitative validation highlighted the importance of system efficiency and waitlist management, confidence, and education in the use of technologies, and continuous training. The quantitative validation identified two main dimensions: "Professional Excellence" and "Remote Clinical Approach," encompassing communication, ethical, legal, and technological aspects. Conclusions: The proposed competencies are suitable for telehealth, emphasizing the need for continuous evaluation and training. An additional quantitative study is recommended to confirm and adjust the model, ensuring that healthcare professionals are prepared to face the challenges of remote care

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.399:id:1056294dm2024399
DOI: 10.56294/dm2024.399
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.399:id:1056294dm2024399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.