IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v3y2024ip.205id1056294dm2024205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Mechanical Ventilation through High Fidelity Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Jeannette Mercedes Acosta Nuñez
  • Mónica Guadalupe Paredes Garcés
  • Jenny del Rocío Molina Salas
  • Carmen Marlene Salguero Fiallos
  • Elizabeth Giovanna Guerrero Guerrero
  • Mery Susana Rodríguez Gamboa
  • Margarita Genoveva Sánchez Yánez
  • Miriam Fernández Nieto

Abstract

Introduction: The study aims to evaluate the use of high-fidelity clinical simulation in teaching mechanical ventilation to students in the master’s program in Nursing with a specialization in Critical Care. The simulation seeks to replicate complex clinical scenarios to improve students' competencies in a controlled and safe environment. Methodology: Simulations based on the HAMILTON-C6 ventilator were used, with students facing mechanical ventilation situations. The High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation Satisfaction Scale (ESSAF) was the instrument employed to measure students' perceptions of the effectiveness of this methodology. Simulation sessions were followed by debriefing to promote critical reflection and practical learning. Results: Students reported high satisfaction with the simulation, highlighting its usefulness in improving clinical assessment and decision-making in critical situations, with an average score of 3.57 for its utility in assessing clinical situations. Additionally, the simulation facilitated self-reflection on performance and the development of technical skills. However, the time allocated to the simulations received a lower rating (average score of 3.13), suggesting the need to extend the sessions for more complete learning. Discussion: The standard deviation showed consistency in the responses regarding the utility of the simulation and its ability to integrate theory and practice. However, there was more variability in perceptions of the difficulty of the cases and simulation time, indicating areas for improvement. Conclusion: Clinical simulation is a valuable tool for teaching mechanical ventilation in critical care, but it is recommended to increase the complexity of the scenarios and adjust the duration of the simulations to optimize learning.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.205:id:1056294dm2024205
DOI: 10.56294/dm2024.205
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:3:y:2024:i::p:.205:id:1056294dm2024205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.