IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v2y2023ip43id1056294dm202343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some metrics on scientific production about fractures

Author

Listed:
  • Lázaro Ernesto Horta Martínez
  • Melissa Sorá Rodríguez

Abstract

Introduction: the rapid and precipitous increase in the number of scientific journals has outlined the hardship of perpetrating periodic assessments of their scientific production or that of a specific area of ​​knowledge. Scientific production is directly related to scientific activity. Objective: describe the production on fractures in the Cuban Journal of Orthopedics and Traumatology. Methods: a metric, descriptive and cross-sectional analysis of the articles published on fractures in the Cuban Journal of Orthopedics and Traumatology (RCOT) was carried out from from 2013 to 2022. Results: a total of 37 articles were collected; 19 (51,4 %) original articles, 12 (32,4 %) case presentations, 4 (10,8 %) bibliographic reviews, 1 (2,7 %) special article and 1 (2,7 %) letter to the editor. The year with the highest scientific production was 2023 (n=19; 51,4 %), in the period 2015-2019 no scientific contributions were reported. The total originality rate is 51,4 %, with 2013 being the year with the highest rate with 100 %, although together with 2014 they represent the most unproductive years within the productive ones, 2014 has an originality rate of 0 %. Conclusions: the production on fractures in the RCOT had a notable representation in the period 2020-2021 and showed a tendency to progress in this regard; but work still needs to be done in order to endorse optimal visibility of the contents on this topic, as well as a greater citation of these, to which the publication in English and the persuasion of collaborators of other nationalities could greatly contribute

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:2:y:2023:i::p:43:id:1056294dm202343
DOI: 10.56294/dm202343
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:2:y:2023:i::p:43:id:1056294dm202343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.