IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/datame/v2y2023ip124id1056294dm2023124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward Efficiency and Accuracy: Implementation of a Semiautomated Data Capture and Processing Model for the Construction of a Hospital-based Tumor Registry in Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina Villalobos
  • Carla Cavallera
  • Matías Espinoza
  • María Francisca Cid
  • Inti Paredes

Abstract

Introduction: the innovative implementation of a Hospital-based cancer registry (HBCR) at the Arturo López Pérez Oncology Institute (FALP), showcasing the transition from a manual data extraction model to a semi-automation of the process. The purpose of this publication is to compare both methodologies by assessing their efficiency and accuracy. Methods: the analysis was conducted by comparing the complete dataset of the FALP HBCR from 2017 to 2021. The efficiency variable is analyzed, taking into account the total execution time of the registration process, and the precision variable was measured through the internal data consistency method using the IARCcrg Tools Software Results: in terms of efficiency, the analysis reveals that in 2017, employing a manual approach without automation, it was necessary to analyze 13 061 cases over 144 weeks with an average of 4 registrars to achieve a total of 3 211 cases fully registered. In contrast, over the subsequent 4 years (2018 to 2021), with varying degrees of automation, 65 088 cases were analyzed within 115 weeks, employing an average of 8 registrars, resulting in 13 537 fully registered. This method demonstrated to be 3 times more efficient. Regarding precision, the manual approach exhibited a 5 % error rate in registered cases, whereas the automated approach showed a 0,6 % error rate during the 2018-2021 period. Conclusion: the obtained results highlight the significant impact of semi-automating the tumor registration process through the utilization of tools for data capture and processing, achieving a threefold increase in efficiency and reducing errors to 0,6 %

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:2:y:2023:i::p:124:id:1056294dm2023124
DOI: 10.56294/dm2023124
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:datame:v:2:y:2023:i::p:124:id:1056294dm2023124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dm.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.