IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbb/jlaraa/v2y2025i2p20-25.html

A Comparative Study of the Chinese Classifier "ZHI" and the Vietnamese Classifier "CON"

Author

Listed:
  • Yen, Nguyen Thi Hai

Abstract

The Chinese classifier "ZHI" and the Vietnamese classifier "CON" are both quantifiers that denote units of objects. These two classifiers share several similarities, such as their frequent use with animal nouns and their formation of "number + classifier + noun" structures. Due to their resemblance, Vietnamese learners often encounter difficulties and make various errors when learning the Chinese classifier "ZHI". These errors result not only from native language interference but also from the inherent complexity of the classifier "ZHI" itself. This paper conducts a comparative analysis of these two classifiers. Although the Chinese classifier "ZHI" and the Vietnamese classifier "CON" have many similarities, each exhibit unique grammatical, semantic, and usage characteristics. This study aims to identify the similarities and differences between the two classifiers in terms of grammar, semantics, and application, thereby contributing to better understanding and instruction of Chinese classifiers for Vietnamese learners.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen, Nguyen Thi Hai, 2025. "A Comparative Study of the Chinese Classifier "ZHI" and the Vietnamese Classifier "CON"," Journal of Literature and Arts Research, George Brown Press, vol. 2(2), pages 20-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:dbb:jlaraa:v:2:y:2025:i:2:p:20-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gbspress.com/index.php/JLAR/article/view/308/316
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbb:jlaraa:v:2:y:2025:i:2:p:20-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Guangyi Li (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.gbspress.com/index.php/JLAR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.