IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/pappsa/v10y2026ip329-335.html

Research on the Dilemmas and Breakthrough Paths of Elite Education and Education Equity in Policy from the Perspective of Role-Based Policy Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Ke

Abstract

With the rapid development of society and the economy, elite education has increasingly become a focal point in discussions of educational equity and social justice. Elite education, while aiming to cultivate high-level talent, often relies on highly selective admission mechanisms and concentrated high-quality resources, which may exacerbate existing inequalities in access and outcomes. From the perspective of role-based policy debate, this study examines how different stakeholders-such as policymakers, educators, parents, and students-frame and contest the relationship between elite education and education equity in policy processes. The analysis identifies key dilemmas, including uneven allocation of educational resources, class stratification reinforced by schooling pathways, and the strong influence of family economic background on educational opportunities and trajectories. These factors hinder the realization of substantive educational equity and contribute to the concentration of advantages among specific social groups. On this basis, the paper explores potential breakthrough paths through more inclusive enrollment policies, diversified support systems, and mechanisms for sharing social and educational resources. It further discusses how digital technologies can help reduce geographical and economic barriers, thereby expanding equal learning opportunities. By employing role-based policy debate and role play, participants can articulate interests, reveal policy trade-offs, and co-construct more sustainable policy designs that balance the development of elite education with the pursuit of education equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Ke, 2026. "Research on the Dilemmas and Breakthrough Paths of Elite Education and Education Equity in Policy from the Perspective of Role-Based Policy Debate," Pinnacle Academic Press Proceedings Series, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 10, pages 329-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:pappsa:v:10:y:2026:i::p:329-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/PAPPS/article/view/662/640
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:pappsa:v:10:y:2026:i::p:329-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/PAPPS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.