IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/jsppaa/v2y2026i4p195-211.html

LLM-Augmented Machine Learning for Cross-Channel Media Allocation in E-Commerce Marketing

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiaochen
  • Meng, Siquan
  • Wang, Jason

Abstract

This paper develops and evaluates an LLM-augmented machine-learning workflow for cross-channel media allocation in e-commerce marketing. The empirical analysis uses the Multi-Region Marketing Mix Modelling dataset released on Figshare, which contains anonymized marketing and purchase observations for e-commerce brands across regions and digital channels. Daily observations were aggregated to a weekly panel of 19,082 brand-region time-series records. Media spend was represented at the Google, Meta, and TikTok platform level, with adstock and saturation transformations, non-paid demand controls, seasonality, panel fixed effects, and a time-based train-validation-test design. Four models were compared: Ridge MMM, Elastic Net MMM, Random Forest, and XGBoost. Random Forest achieved the best out-of-sample sMAPE of 0.322 and log-scale R2 of 0.908 on the held-out test period, outperforming regularized linear MMM baselines while preserving an interpretable allocation layer. Counterfactual fixed-budget simulations shifted average allocation from 69.3% Google, 30.5% Meta, and 0.3% TikTok to 87.1% Google, 11.5% Meta, and 1.4% TikTok. The median predicted lift was 5.17%, and the 5%-95% trimmed mean lift was 24.56%. A constrained language-model memo layer converted the empirical outputs into channel-specific recommendations and guardrails. The study shows that MMM-style feature engineering, supervised learning, privacy-aware incrementality analysis, and LLM-assisted explanation can be combined into a reproducible decision-support pipeline for e-commerce media planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiaochen & Meng, Siquan & Wang, Jason, 2026. "LLM-Augmented Machine Learning for Cross-Channel Media Allocation in E-Commerce Marketing," Journal of Sustainability, Policy, and Practice, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(4), pages 195-211.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:4:p:195-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSPP/article/view/981/940
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:4:p:195-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSPP .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.