Author
Abstract
Financial anomaly detection has evolved from static classification toward sequence-aware learning that leverages the temporal structure of transaction streams. Four families of temporal neural architectures are now routinely applied in this domain: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), Transformer encoders, and Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN). Existing empirical comparisons are typically restricted to a single dataset and a single problem granularity, leaving open the question of how these architectures rank when evaluated under a common protocol across transaction-level and node-level risk prediction. This paper presents a controlled empirical comparison of the four architectures on three real financial datasets: the ULB European credit-card transactions released by Worldline and the ULB Machine Learning Group, the IEEE-CIS card-not-present dataset contributed by Vesta Corporation, and the Elliptic Bitcoin transaction graph released by Elliptic together with the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab. Under a unified sequence-learning interface with matched preprocessing and matched parameter budgets, the four architectures are examined using ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, F1, and recall. The Transformer attains the highest mean ROC-AUC on each of the three datasets, with GRU and TCN close behind and LSTM slightly trailing; on the smallest dataset, however, the spread is of the same order as the five-seed standard deviation, and the cross-dataset ordering should be read as an ordering of sample means under a shared sequence interface rather than as a strict apples-to-apples separation. The widest inter-architecture F1 gap emerges on the Elliptic node-level setting. By framing anomaly detection as a temporal behavioral modeling problem rather than an isolated classification task, the study highlights the capacity of sequence-aware architectures to capture evolving transaction patterns and positions temporal scoring as a mechanism to strengthen platform reliability and user trust.
Suggested Citation
Lu, Yinzhe, 2026.
"Temporal Deep Learning for Financial Fraud Detection: A Comparative Evaluation of LSTM, GRU, Transformer, and TCN on Real Transaction Datasets,"
Journal of Sustainability, Policy, and Practice, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(4), pages 169-182.
Handle:
RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:4:p:169-182
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:4:p:169-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSPP .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.