IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/jsppaa/v2y2026i3p50-61.html

Fairness-Constrained Temporal Feature Learning Algorithm for Cross-Population Glucose Prediction and Adherence Risk Stratification Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Xizhu

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data provides granular temporal information that enables individualized diabetes management, yet existing glucose prediction algorithms are predominantly trained and evaluated on small, homogeneous cohorts, raising concerns about cross-population generalizability and demographic equity. This study proposes a fairness-constrained temporal feature learning algorithm that integrates patch-based Transformer encoding with adversarial debiasing to improve cross-population glucose prediction accuracy and adherence risk stratification. Using four publicly available CGM benchmark datasets encompassing 243 participants across diverse diabetes types and demographic backgrounds, we evaluate the proposed approach against five baseline algorithms across 30-minute and 60-minute prediction horizons. Subgroup-stratified analysis reveals that the fairness-constrained approach reduces the maximum inter-group RMSE disparity from 4.83 mg/dL to 1.97 mg/dL at the 30-minute horizon while maintaining competitive overall prediction accuracy (RMSE: 18.26 mg/dL). CGM wear-time gap features extracted by the temporal encoder achieve an AUC of 0.817 for 7-day adherence risk prediction. These findings demonstrate that incorporating fairness constraints into CGM temporal feature learning can mitigate demographic performance disparities without substantial accuracy trade-offs, supporting more equitable data-driven diabetes care aligned with national chronic disease reduction strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Xizhu, 2026. "Fairness-Constrained Temporal Feature Learning Algorithm for Cross-Population Glucose Prediction and Adherence Risk Stratification Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data," Journal of Sustainability, Policy, and Practice, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(3), pages 50-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:3:p:50-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/jspp/article/view/716/689
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:3:p:50-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSPP .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.