IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/jsppaa/v2y2026i2p18-31.html

Explainable Risk Stratification for Polypharmacy-Related Adverse Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Elderly: A Rule-Enhanced Machine Learning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yijie

Abstract

Polypharmacy among community-dwelling elderly populations presents substantial clinical challenges, including elevated risks of falls, delirium, and hospital readmission. This study proposes a hybrid rule-enhanced machine learning framework for explainable risk stratification without requiring specialized clinical systems. The methodology integrates rule-based screening using established pharmacological risk dictionaries with gradient boosting algorithms to generate interpretable probability estimates for adverse outcomes. Patient medication lists are standardized to generic nomenclature and mapped to sedative burden scores, anticholinergic indices, and drug-drug interaction matrices. The framework outputs 30-day and 90-day readmission risk probabilities alongside actionable clinical recommendations. Evaluation encompasses high-risk detection recall, false positive rates, SHAP-based feature contribution analysis, and subgroup fairness metrics across vulnerable populations including living-alone, minority, and LGBTQ+ elderly cohorts. Results demonstrate the potential for reproducible, transparent algorithmic approaches to enhance medication safety review in community care settings while supporting health equity objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yijie, 2026. "Explainable Risk Stratification for Polypharmacy-Related Adverse Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Elderly: A Rule-Enhanced Machine Learning Approach," Journal of Sustainability, Policy, and Practice, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(2), pages 18-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:2:p:18-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/jspp/article/view/678/656
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:jsppaa:v:2:y:2026:i:2:p:18-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSPP .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.