IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/jsisia/v2y2026i1p264-275.html

A Comparative Study of Reinforcement Learning and Metaheuristic Algorithms for Real-Time Last-Mile Delivery Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jialu

Abstract

The exponential growth of e-commerce has intensified the need for efficient real-time delivery-scheduling algorithms that can handle dynamic urban logistics environments. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of reinforcement learning and metaheuristic algorithms for last-mile delivery optimization under time-sensitive constraints. We implement and evaluate Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS) and Deep Q-Network (DQN) approaches on benchmark instances representing realistic urban delivery scenarios with 50-200 customer nodes. The experimental results demonstrate that ALNS achieves superior solution quality with an average optimality gap of 3.2% under an approximately 5-second (≤6 s) operational time budget, while DQN exhibits better runtime scalability for networks exceeding 150 customers (in the stress-test setting). The sensitivity analysis reveals critical trade-offs between computational efficiency and solution robustness under varying traffic conditions. This research provides empirical guidelines for logistics practitioners to select appropriate algorithms based on operational constraints, thereby contributing to sustainable urban transportation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jialu, 2026. "A Comparative Study of Reinforcement Learning and Metaheuristic Algorithms for Real-Time Last-Mile Delivery Scheduling," Journal of Science, Innovation & Social Impact, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(1), pages 264-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:jsisia:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:264-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSISI/article/view/540/528
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:jsisia:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:264-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSISI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.