IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/jsisia/v1y2026i1p452-462.html

Classifying Tenant Legal Inquiries: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Deep Learning Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hanfei

Abstract

Legal aid organizations face increasing demand for tenant protection services amid limited resources. Accurate classification of tenant inquiries enables efficient case routing and volunteer attorney matching. This study compares traditional machine learning methods (Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machines) with deep learning approaches (BERT fine-tuning) for classifying tenant legal inquiries across four categories: illegal eviction, housing repairs, security deposit disputes, and rent disagreements. Experiments on 450 de-identified tenant assistance requests reveal that sample size critically impacts method selection. Traditional approaches demonstrate robust performance with fewer than 150 samples, while BERT achieves superior accuracy (F1-score 0.89 vs 0.81) with datasets exceeding 300 samples. Mixed-issue cases involving multiple complaint types pose consistent challenges across all methods. Results inform practical deployment strategies for legal aid intake workflows.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hanfei, 2026. "Classifying Tenant Legal Inquiries: A Comparative Study of Traditional and Deep Learning Approaches," Journal of Science, Innovation & Social Impact, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 1(1), pages 452-462.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:jsisia:v:1:y:2026:i:1:p:452-462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSISI/article/view/954/914
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:jsisia:v:1:y:2026:i:1:p:452-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/JSISI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.