IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/ijlpsa/v2y2026i1p1-12.html

The "Institutional Strength Training" Framework: A Comparative Analysis of the Resource Curse and Governance Resilience in Norway, Botswana, and Venezuela (Applications for Mongolia)

Author

Listed:
  • Davagsuren, Otgonjargal

Abstract

This study examines the natural resource curse and the role of institutional quality in shaping socio-economic outcomes in resource-rich countries. Employing a qualitative comparative case study approach based on the Most Different Systems Design (MDSD), it analyzes the governance trajectories of Norway, Botswana, and Venezuela, with particular attention to the evolving institutional context of Mongolia. Drawing on longitudinal data from the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) and the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) spanning 2000-2025, the analysis suggests that resource abundance is more likely to be associated with sustainable growth when mediated by credible fiscal rules and transparent oversight mechanisms. The study further explores the potential of Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies-most notably blockchain and artificial intelligence-as potential "digital institutional stabilizers" capable of constraining rent-seeking behaviors in emerging economies. Overall, the findings indicate that institutional resilience should be understood not as a passive outcome of economic development, but as a dynamic process shaped by deliberate policy choices, including sovereign wealth funds designed to operate on a non-partisan basis and technology-enabled transparency arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Davagsuren, Otgonjargal, 2026. "The "Institutional Strength Training" Framework: A Comparative Analysis of the Resource Curse and Governance Resilience in Norway, Botswana, and Venezuela (Applications for Mongolia)," International Journal of Law, Policy & Society, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:ijlpsa:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:1-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/IJLPS/article/view/478/472
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:ijlpsa:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/IJLPS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.