IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/ijllcs/v2y2026i1p1-12.html

Technological Salvation or Secular Utopia? Christian Metaphors in Artificial Intelligence Discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai, Ziwei

Abstract

This research article examines the pervasive use of Christian metaphors in discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI), analyzing whether these metaphors function as promises of technological salvation or secular utopias. The study investigates how concepts like 'creation,' 'intelligence,' 'transcendence,' and 'the singularity' echo religious narratives, shaping public perception and ethical considerations of AI development. Through a critical analysis of academic papers, industry reports, and popular media, the research identifies specific instances where Christian theological frameworks are implicitly or explicitly employed to frame AI's potential impact on humanity. Furthermore, it explores the implications of imbuing AI with religious significance, questioning whether this metaphorical language fosters unrealistic expectations, masks potential risks, or reinforces existing power structures. The analysis considers historical precedents of technological utopianism and secularization, drawing parallels and divergences between past aspirations and current narratives surrounding AI. Ultimately, this article seeks to deconstruct the theological underpinnings of AI discourse, offering a nuanced perspective on the cultural, ethical, and philosophical dimensions of this rapidly evolving technology. The goal is to promote a more critical and informed understanding of AI's potential benefits and challenges, disentangled from the often-unacknowledged influence of religious metaphors.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai, Ziwei, 2026. "Technological Salvation or Secular Utopia? Christian Metaphors in Artificial Intelligence Discourse," International Journal of Literature, Linguistics, and Cultural Studies, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:dba:ijllcs:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:1-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/IJLLCS/article/view/475/469
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:ijllcs:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/IJLLCS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.